Propane Camping Stoves Dedicated for the camping lovers trying to find that perfect camping stoves

Doesn’t Maine’s Constitution Prohibit “Statutes” that do not adhere to Federal Law?

Current Federal Law, if you can believe those hocking electric bikes, encourages Gas saving measures such as Electric bikes.

With regard to electric bikes I’m informed the Federal Statutes State that: one, the Federal Statutes clearly state such Statutes supercede State Laws and two, the Legal definition of a bike is: any bike powered by less than a 750 watt electric motor and under a 20 mph capability (with a rider of 170 lbs or so?).

But the Maine Statute clearly defines a bike as only human powered; no motor at all allowed without a license.

This State Statute clearly excludes de@dbeat dads from using any form of powered transport, even if such a bike as he does use is legal even when loaded down with a hot Coleman stove and white gas by the gallon, to provide that poor sad sap with “fuel” to manually push the bike. I don’t know about you, but I’d rather he be able to go faster, rather than port about a hot Coleman stove, but I guess persecution motivates conservative Law.
I read the Maine Constitution. I guess the State Lawmakers have better things to do, like fashion laws that are clearly Sanguinary.

My read of our Constitution clearly dictated adherence to Federal Laws, rather than self serving petty fuedalism and a State sponsored return to slavery, by family court edict.
Actually, no, I’m not talking about a definition, in the normal sense, which in matters of Law are usually given the courts to “define”. This is referencing a specific Statute that actually defines bikes as any electrically assisted divice under 750 Watts …etc. It is a Federal Statute that further goes on to State that it is meant by the Federal Government to supercede any State Laws to the contrary.

And as for the notion that no State Government is in no way bound to respect the Constitution of that State in restricting the use or rights of ways of public ways against any minority citizen, that’s simply nuts. Aint it? Otherwise, we would all be subject to State Laws restricting use of highways to State Lawmakers and their own favorite guys?

Oh wait, that is what your saying! By rhetorically calling people that would never vote for such traitors “de@dbeats” they ‘limit’ the use of public highways (and fuel supplies) to those that are traitors, like yourself

Clever Traitors?
Slavery is saying : ” you cannot work for anyone we don’t want you to work for including yourself and if you don’t work at all we just might hurt you to death”, no? That is what De@dbeat dad “findings” do. They do not feed kids, they restrict the ability of men to feed kids (or go on strike or get sick on the job or quit and found a competing business, etc…) while restricting the role of media coverage of the issue to pro-court stories “for the good of the kids” ~ rhetorically (in terms of pure communist propaganda ~ communism being defined as a economic system wherein the State controls the means of production ~ as the de@dbeat dadding conserfatives do by elimination).

Yes, it is persecution.

How else would you define a finding that permits a court to order a man d ate r ape d rugged “as a treatment for his tax kleptomania” evidenced by his being a Liberal. This in a time of AIDS. Then screaming de@dbeat when any “unforseen and unfortunate accidents of nature” like kids happen
And mr. M. C. I was speaking of Constitutional Laws that prohibit a State Legislature from resticting the rights of a person within that State. You never even touch on that at all, why?

Conservatives love Constitutional law when it “favors” a finding (in their minds) that the conserfatives can betray the nations interests ~ such as by elimination of taxation while growing a public debt in the tens of trillions, “because denominations on soft curency are constitutionally more important than the actual worth of any given curency”????????? That is your “insanity attack” in a nut shell, no? Your movement does define the defenders of our nations real wealth as insane because of Ron Reagan’s “take” on such mental health issues as kleptomania, as they impact economic theory???

But, when the obvious, such a Constitutional Law that states clearly Maine will not restrict it’s citizen’s rights more than that Federal Statutes restrict them, you wax silly. You say “clearly we are ignorent”?
P’rushim, no right exists to any Governmental body to break Constitutional prohibitions against seizing unauthorized power.

The public ways were and always have been public. Restricting the use of public ways (especially all public ways) to a healthy majority is simply Unconstitutional. Saying the sick who aren’t favored by the ruling court cannot use the public ways is in and of itself a false use of power, but it’s worse when there are Constitutional Prohibitions against that specific act (by placing Federally afforded rights both statutory and Constitutional over those any State Law might otherwise tend to restrict, the Maine Constitution does prohibit such treasons specifically).

Even the most hard hearted lunatic Conserfative must admit courts get things wrong on occassion whole hog and “on purpose”, and descriminate against minorities. I maintain that now de@dbeat dad “findings” are one such attempt at genocidal court “findings”.
For instance, I’m a decorated Veteran.

Conserfatives didn’t find this.

I’m a wounded, decorated veteran.

Conserfatives “can’t find this”.

I’m a wounded, decorated veteran with a price on his head from a foreign government, for deeds done on your behalf at a time of war.

Conserfatives, being the “everything changed after 9-11 kinda guys that they are simply cannot “find this”.

They don’t think a Liberal counts enough to “find this”.

Instead, they sanctioned repeated attempts on my life by “allies” of the conserfative movement…

After all, Ron Said “I think some day, all Communists will be seen as mentally ill” (because, like liberals here in America, they taxed some of their people for the express benifit of others in their own society ~ such as to teach school to kids ~ which Ron “found” was UnConstitutional” because even the Commie Reds didn’t have the Authority to so tax. Weak minds find individual denominations have import over the worth overal in money.
Thus, to Ron, and you (?), if you have a handfull of monopoly money, and I tax it and take $2, then give $1 to the guy next door, but this proves to actually increase the “worth” of your total boodle by lowering the cost of Boardwalk, and you can then buy Boardwalk and win, you’ve been cheated.

But in the real world, it really does work that way. All those Boardwalks are less expensive if you teach the neighbors kids, by taxing some for the good of all. And Liberal Economics is the more advanced and effective economics.

No other government would ever go back to being poor and economically dominated; why has ours? Because you and other consrfatives are sick? Like Ron? I think so. Wake up. Liberals were not kleptomaniacs. Liberals made the USA possible, even likely.

All those nations that refused Liberal Economics have done much worse, with like resources. Just like we have been doing for the last 28 years.

But you “just” keep counting beans, or a variable soft curency, hard.
snowbuf,

Your argument is that Congress passes “laws” that regulate things such as speed on public roads, and that this is unconstitutional.

No, it isn’t. It is providing for the public welfare, and common defence. People die on highways at a rediculous amount.

But this is not what the State is doing in my case, nor in the average case of the de@dbeat dad. It is persecuting a minority with a better economic argument, that is always dominant where ever it is allowed voice.

So, the “State”, in 1980 was in your mind a group of d rug dealers who stole an election, legally, by giving d ope for votes, and conferming those votes with electronic cameras, which were a new technology in 1980. Forevermore you would have this Nation (a word meaning Nay Shall Yee Shun) ruled by these criminals because they discovered the Yellow Dog Republican will never question if “his party’s” candidate is actually a Republican at all and thus they bought a swing vote with d ope.
snowbuf,

You state that this is an unlawfull thing but that all governmental activities are unlawfull because you aren’t told in language you can understand that the government can protect you from yourself, especially in matters silly, such as driving in a reckless manner for no purpose. (I’m pretty sure even you understand the average cop does not ticket a Pregnant woman speeding to hospital while bleeding prefusely ~ in other words with due cause to speed).

I once so sped down the road myself following an accident, while under the influence of “medicine” ~ proscribed without my knowledge or consent by fraudulent conserfatives in order to prevent prosecutions against themselves for doing murders and selling illicit d ope for private gain with public money. I dropped a kid in the Tub, while having a stress induced seizure.

I didn’t know.
But, as you mock: “get off the d ope”. Allot clears up. Thing is, when you elect liars, who murder policemen, they hide crimes, -w- d ope
So, my argument is that the Government has long established the right to speed in certain cases wherein public good is evident.

It has long established the right to voice an opinion, which buy purchasing one’s town the criminals can practically prevent.

So, it is the duty therefore of the soldier to get to where his purpose can be expressed, just as the woman finds when she has a car and the water breaks.

But crippled soldiers cannot do this by a bike, without assistance. In modern America, with traitors in charge most honest soldiers are being crippled ~ if they aren’t so already.

All soldiers might express themselves if they can get transport away from areas limited by the enemy.

Transport has been designed that permits such travel as safely as might be done by healthy soldiers; this is done via an electrical motor on the bike.

That fact is recognised by the Federal Government.

Free Speech, Democracy, and the Disability rights of wounded soldiers, respect !

Coleman Camp Stove 413F $40.00

Coleman 2-Burner Propane Stove Camping Picnic Cooking Stove w Wind Block Sys NEW $65.99

vintage coleman camping stove 425 e green portable stove 425E kansas $14.99

Coleman Propane Single Burner Stove $9.99

NEW Coleman Portable PerfectFlow Propane Camp Grill - Camping Stove - Blue $64.95

Farberware 50124 Classic Yosemite Stainless Steel Percolator $14.99 Product Features Sleek percolator brews 4 to 8 cups coffee Permanent filter basket; no messy paper filters needed Made of 18/10 stainless steel polished to mirror-finish Stay-cool synthetic handle; dishwasher safe Measures 8-1/4 by 6-5/6 by 9 inches Amazon.com Review Sleek and contemporary, this gleaming percolator brews from four to eight cups of coffee on the stovetop for full, old-fashioned fla...

Lodge Double Play Reversible Grill Griddle $27.84 Already seasoned from the American foundry and ready to use, the cast iron experts at Lodge bring to your kitchen a reversible grill/griddle to fit over 2 burners with 2-in-1 convenience: breakfast griddle reverses to a large grill to enjoy authentic grilled steaks, chicken, pork chops or hamburgers indoors. Channels on the grill side drain grease for cooking healthy meals. Lodge Logic's preseason...

Clear glass percolator top, fits Farberware, etc. $5.49 Fits some of the following brands: Bersted, Cameo, Chilton, Columbian, Comet, Cory, Dominion, Enterprise, Farberware, General Electric, Halite, Hamilton-Beach, Kenmore-Sears, Manning-Bowman, Mirro, Presto, Proctor-Silex, Regal, Sunbeam, Toastmaster, Wear-Ever, West Bend, Westinghouse, Universal and Many More...

Pop-lite Butane-universal Gas Lighter Refill 1 Can $3.98 ...

COLEMAN REPAIR & REPLACEMENT PARTS Ball Nut $1.77 Coleman Ventilater Ball Nut Replacement Nut For Colemans Lanterns All items sold new in original packaging...

Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)

• Related posts on Constitution
• People's Blog for the Constitution :: News Digest 12/20/10
• Spartanburg Tea Party | Republicans Start Teaching Members How to …